Haitian “Temporary Protected Status” to end in July 2019

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced on November 20, 2017 that it will end Haitian Temporary Protected Status (TPS) effective July 22, 2019.  Approximately 60,000 Haitians in the U.S. have TPS, nearly a quarter of whom have lived here for over 20 years, and many have U.S. citizen children.
TPS was created by Congress to provide individuals already in the U.S. when a natural catastrophe, or eruption or escalation of civil conflict strikes their country, an opportunity to stay and work legally in the U.S. until our government decides it is safe for them to return.   TPS is typically granted in 12 or 18 month increments, which can be extended.
The U.S. designated Haiti for TPS after Haiti’s January 2010 earthquake, and has extended Haitian TPS multiple times.  In explaining its decision to end Haitian TPS, DHS stated that conditions in Haiti have improved enough for Haitians with TPS to be repatriated.  However, the State Department’s most recent human rights report on Haiti found there were still over 55,000 internally displaced Haitians living in tent camps, public K-12 education is neither free nor universally available, official corruption is common,  human rights abuses abound, and conditions are still unsettled.
  • Why does this matter to Maine’s business community?
Maine has many Haitians with TPS working throughout the state in agriculture, hospitality, factories, and healthcare settings, among others.  They are important members of our communities and our economy, and they help shore up Maine’s shrinking workforce.
Announcements are also expected soon on whether TPS will be extended or ended for Hondurans, who have had it since 1999, and Salvadorans, who have had TPS since 2001.   Termination of TPS for these two countries would result in over 250,000 more immigrants being pushed out of our country and our workforce.    One report estimates that the U.S. economy will see a $164 billion drop in the GDP over a decade after Haitians, Hondurans, and Salvadorans exit the workforce due to the ending of their TPS.   The human toll is high as well.  TPS holders from these three countries are parents to over 270,000 U.S. citizen children.
Several bills have been introduced in Congress that would provide a path to permanent residency for long-term TPS holders, but none are yet gaining real traction.

Maine State Chamber, Maine AFL-CIO, urge solution for DACA/Dreamers

In a November 19, 2017 Bangor Daily News opinion piece, Maine State Chamber of Commerce CEO Dana Connors joined Cynthia Phinney, President of the Maine AFL-CIO, to urge Congress to pass legislation creating a path to permanent status for those holding Deferred Action for Childhood Removals (DACA) status, also known as Dreamers.  These are immigrants who entered the U.S. when they were children, who have lived here for at least ten years, and for many of whom the U.S. is the only home that they can remember.

Approximately 800,000 immigrants benefited from the DACA program before it was rescinded by the current Administration on September 5, 2017.   Without Congressional action, beginning on March 6, 2018, each week more than 8500 immigrants with DACA will lose their permission to live and work legally in the U.S.   The Dream Act of 2017 (S. 1615, H.R. 3440) would allow those who have DACA to apply for permanent residency, an option that doesn’t exist for the vast majority of them under current law.

Dana Connors is on MeBIC’s Board of Directors, and the Maine State Chamber of Commerce is a MeBIC Partner.

U.S. Chamber of Commerce supports speedy passage of the Dream Act of 2017

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce,  on November 15, 2017,  renewed its call on Congress to act before the end of 2017 to pass  legislation creating a path to permanent residency, such as the Dream Act of 2017 (S. 1615, H.R. 3440), for the nearly 800,000 immigrants with DACA status.  Congressional inaction will result in over 8500 DACA holders each week losing their legal status and legal ability to work, starting on March 6, 2018.   By November 2018, about 300,000 DACA holders will have been forced out of the workforce, joined by over 400,000 more through 2019.  The costs to the U.S. economy in turnover expenses, lost tax revenues, and negative impact on the GDP are estimated to be in the hundreds of billions of dollars; not to mention the costs to our communities in which DACA holders are our neighbors, relatives, students, volunteers, workers and entrepreneurs.

Yesterday’s statement coincided with a day of action on Capitol Hill attended by over 100 DACA holders and additional business leaders.   The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has been a consistent supporter of a path to residency for these immigrants.


Travel Ban 3.0 (update)

Following legal challenges partially blocking President Trump’s first two travel bans, on September 24, 2017, President Trump announced a new version, commonly being referred to as “Travel Ban 3.0.”   It was largely blocked one day before taking effect on October 18, 2017, by two separate decisions by the Federal District Courts of Hawai’i and Maryland.   These decisions were temporary, pending December hearings on the legal challenges.

On November 13, 2017, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals allowed parts of Travel Ban 3.0 to go into effect while the legal challenges run their course.

Current state of play (Note: this is not intended to be a substitute for individualized legal advice).

The following people from the targeted countries will not be issued immigrant (permanent residency) or nonimmigrant (temporary stay) visas or be allowed to enter the U.S.,  unless they can prove a “credible claim of a bona fide relationship with a person or entity” in the U.S., as explained further below:

  • Chad, Libya and Yemen: All immigrants and, nonimmigrant visitors for pleasure or business.
  • Iran: All immigrants and nonimmigrants, with the exception of student and exchange (F, M and J) nonimmigrant visa holders (who nonetheless will undergo extra scrutiny).
  • North Korea and Syria: All immigrants and nonimmigrants.
  • Somalia: All immigrants. All nonimmigrants will be subject to extra scrutiny.
  • Venezuela: Certain government officials and their family members, traveling on visitor or other non-diplomatic nonimmigrant visas.

The ban applies to people from the named countries who were outside the U.S. and did not have valid, previously issued U.S. visas on the ban’s effective date.  It does not apply to:

  • Dual nationals using the passport of their non-targeted country.
  • U.S. Permanent residents (green card holders), or those who already have refugee, asylee, or withholding of removal status in the U.S., who are from the targeted countries and are returning from travel abroad.
  • Diplomats or those with similar visas.

Waivers of the ban may be issued if determined to be in the national interest, among other criteria.  As a practical matter, waivers will be virtually impossible to get.

A “bona fide relationship with a person or entity” in the U.S. in the family context should include: parents, spouses, children of any age, siblings and half-siblings, and these step-relationships, as well as fiancée(e)s, sons and daughters-in-law, grandparents, grandchildren, brothers and sisters-in-law, aunts, uncles, nieces nephews, nieces and cousins.

A “bona fide relationship” with an entity should include students accepted to study at U.S. educational institutions, persons offered employment at U.S. employers, and those invited to attend conferences or to speak at lectures, etc. However, the definition currently excludes those accepted for resettlement by a U.S. refugee resettlement agency who have not yet received their refugee visas to travel to the U.S.

How does this effect Maine businesses?

  • It is unclear how generously the government will interpret the exception for those with a bona fide relationship to an “entity.”   Universities and businesses hoping to bring a national of one of the targeted countries to the U.S. to lecture, study, present at a conference, or to work, should expect the visa issuance process to take longer than usual, and should work with an experienced immigration attorney.
  • Any employees from the specified countries, whether naturalized U.S. Citizens, permanent residents, refugees, asylees, or nonimmigrants with unexpired visas,  can expect a heightened level of questioning at U.S. ports of entry following any travel abroad, despite the fact that Travel Ban 3.0 is not supposed to apply to them.  They should be advised to consult with a competent immigration attorney before traveling abroad.
  • If you have immigrant employees from any of the named countries, be aware of their fear and worry that their relatives, whom they might have been expecting to immigrate soon, may not be able to come, despite the exception to the travel ban for those with family members already in the U.S. under the current injunction.
  • If you have an employee who needs to renew her/his work visa abroad, the process may be more complicated and take much longer than usual because of the need for an in-person interview at the relevant U.S. consulate.

New severe limits on Refugee resettlement will impact Maine’s workforce (Updated)

11/13/2017 Update:  Today, a federal class action lawsuit was filed challenging “Travel Ban 4.0″‘s  suspension of the processing of refugees from the 11 countries mentioned below, and of the spouses and children of refugees already resettled in the U.S.  MeBIC will update this page as the case progresses.


On September 24, 2017, the Administration published its determination of the number of refugees that will be allowed into the U.S. during FY 2018.   Then, on October 24, 2017, President Trump issued an Executive Order (referred to as EO-4 or Travel Ban 4.0) announcing changes to the implementation of the federal Refugee Resettlement Program.

  • What are the changes to the U.S. Refugee Resettlement Program?

Lower total numbers admitted: For FY 2018 (October 1, 2017, to September 30, 2018), the Administration  will cap refugee admissions at 45,000, the lowest number since Congress passed the Refugee Act of 1980. In comparison, last year’s cap was 110,000. The average cap since 1980 has been about 95,000. With a record high of over 65 million displaced people in the world currently, including 22.5 million refugees, this low ceiling greatly diminishes the U.S.’s commitment to provide protection at a time of unprecedented humanitarian crises worldwide.

Refugee admissions from eleven predominantly Muslim countries temporarily suspended:  During a 90 day “review period”, refugees from 11 countries will not be resettled in the U.S. unless they can show, on a case-by-case basis, that their resettlement would be in the national interest, among other criteria. The targeted countries are understood to be Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Mali, North Korea, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen. As a practical matter, virtually no one will meet the “national interest” test.

Admission of immediate family members of refugees indefinitely suspended:  Processing of refugee applications to reunify spouses and children of refugees already resettled in the U.S. (“principal refugees”) is suspended indefinitely, causing significant uncertainty and delays, while the government undertakes a review of  its procedures.

Heightened scrutiny:  Finally, applicants for refugee resettlement will face heightened scrutiny, despite historically having been the most thoroughly vetted category of noncitizens coming to the U.S.   New requirements include providing addresses going back 10 years, rather than the usual five, and providing email addresses and phone numbers of all members of their family tree, no matter where in the world these relatives are.   People forced to flee wars or persecution often move frequently and live informally (without a fixed address) and in many cases may lose contact with members of their family. These new requirements, as a practical matter, may result in refugees who need and deserve resettlement being denied.

  • How will this affect Maine’s businesses?

Maine is home to many immigrants from Iran, Iraq, Somali, South Sudan, Sudan and Syria.   The FY2018 restrictions on refugee admissions will mean that Maine residents from these countries who were anticipating reuniting imminently with their  family members still abroad, including their spouses and children, now face further separations and uncertainty about whether this will be the last delay. The other changes will prolong the family reunifications of refugees coming from other countries not on the list of eleven, as well.

Affected immigrants working in Maine will face great emotional and financial strain due to the postponed reunification with their loved ones. In addition, due to all of these changes, Maine will resettle hundreds fewer refugees than it has in recent years, at a time when we need to grow our population for the health of our communities and our labor supply.

MeBIC in the media on DACA and the Dream Act of 2017 (updated)

On September 5, 2017, the day that the Trump Administration announced its rescission of DACA, the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program,  the George Hale and Rick Tyler show on Bangor-based WVOM radio interviewed MeBIC’s Beth Stickney about DACA and the reasons why DACA holders need a path to permanent residency in the U.S.

Beth Stickney appeared in a September 14, 2017 article in The Ellsworth American about the negative impact that the end of the DACA program will have on Maine’s labor force, including in Washington County.

On September 27, 2017, MeBIC’s Board Secretary Dana Connors, the CEO of the Maine State Chamber of Commerce, spoke to Maine Public radio about why 30 business, education and economic development leaders sent a letter to Maine’s Congressional delegation urging them to pass the Dream Act of 2017 for those with DACA.

Update:  On November 10, 2017, the Brunswick Times Record published an opinion piece urging passage of the Dream Act of 2017 co-authored by MeBIC’s director Beth Stickney and David Vail, Bowdoin College Professor Emeritus of Economics and chair of Coastal Enterprise, Inc.’s Public Policy Committee.   CEI is a MeBIC partner.

TPS extended briefly for Hondurans, and will end for Nicaraguans

On November 6, 2017, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced that it will end Nicaraguan Temporary Protected Status (TPS) on January 5, 2019, but it has not yet made a decision about terminating Honduran TPS and will therefore extend it for six months while it deliberates.

Congress created TPS to allow foreign-born individuals already in the U.S. when natural disasters strike or civil conflict erupts or escalates in their home countries to apply to stay and work legally in the U.S., until our government determines they can return. TPS is normally granted and extended in 12 or 18-month increments.

Nicaraguans and Hondurans with TPS have lived in the U.S. since at least December 1998, with more than half having lived here for over two decades.  Approximately 57,000 Hondurans nationwide have TPS, and another 3000 Nicaraguans do.   Maine has many Hondurans with TPS living and working in communities throughout the state.  Many have U.S. citizen children.

DHS Acting Secretary Elaine Duke urged Congress to pass legislation to allow the Nicaraguans who will be losing their TPS status, to remain in the U.S. permanently.

U.S. Chamber of Commerce urges Temporary Protected Status extensions

On October 26, 2017, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce wrote a letter urging the Department of Homeland Security to extend Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haitians, Hondurans and Salvadorans, and to work with Congress to create a path to permanent status for these individuals.

Congress created TPS to allow foreign-born individuals already in the U.S. when natural disasters strike or civil conflict escalates in their home countries to apply to stay and work legally in the U.S., until our government determines they can return. TPS is normally granted and extended in 12 or 18-month increments.

Some countries received their TPS designations years ago, and their citizens have received multiple extensions of TPS because their countries could not reabsorb them without significant economic destabilization or due to ongoing wars. In early 2018, four of those countries’ TPS extensions will expire if not renewed by the Department of Homeland Security.   These include:

  • Honduras: TPS has been in effect since 1999 and the current extension will expire January 5, 2018. Approximately 57,000 Hondurans have TPS.
  • Nicaragua: Same as Honduras, except only about 3000 Nicaraguans have TPS.
  • El Salvador: TPS has been in effect since 2001 and the current extension will expire March 9, 2018. Approximately 195,000 Salvadorans have TPS.
  • Haiti: TPS has been in effect since 2010, and the current extension will expire January 22, 2018. Approximately 50,000 Haitians have TPS.

According to a July 2017 report by the Center for Migration Studies, over half of Salvadoran and Honduran TPS holders have lived in the U.S. for more than 20 years. A majority of Salvadoran, Honduran, and Haitian TPS holders are parents to a collective total of more than 273,000 U.S. citizen children. Well over 80% of these TPS recipients are in the workforce, surpassing the rate of 63% for the U.S. native-born population.  They are also our neighbors, our friends, our volunteers, and are integral members of our communities.

Ending TPS for Haitian, Honduran, and Salvadoran TPS holders will result in over 300,000 people exiting our labor force. As the U.S. Chamber of Commerce points out in its letter, nationwide, high numbers of TPS holders work in construction, food processing, hospitality, and home healthcare.

Maine has many TPS recipients, particularly from El Salvador and Honduras, who are indeed working in the sectors mentioned above, and who have a strong presence on Maine’s farms as well. Losing these individuals from our Maine communities and workforce will leave employers scrambling to find replacements in an already tight labor market, and will retard growth.

These individuals have been integral parts of our communities for nearly 20 years or more.  Their TPS status should be extended, and Congress should work to create a path for them to gain permanent residency.